ABSTRACT
Evidence suggests that non-disclosure agreements (‘NDAs’) are widely used. Instead of their intended use of protecting trade secrets and commercially sensitive information, they were exposed during #MeToo as tools to hide sexual harassment and assault. Evidence suggests they remain pervasive and pernicious, and require more scrutiny. As contracts, how legally enforceable are they? The article will attempt to answer this question by applying some well-known contract principles to the real-life NDA between Zelda Perkins and Harvey Weinstein/Miramax, widely reported in the media. This analysis will cast some doubts around their enforceability and at the same time suggest a broader social role for contract law.
Renata Grossi, NDAs: Legally unenforceable or just unethical? A contract law perspective, Alternative Law Journal. First published online 14 October 2025.
Leave a Reply