ABSTRACT
This article presents first results of an empirical investigation into the impact of gender in reported defamation claims in the United Kingdom (UK) and New Zealand (NZ) (2014-2024). The study employed quantitative methodology to identify #MeToo claims. Overall it did not reveal a flood of such cases. There was a small number of media defendants in the identified #MeToo cases, reflecting early settlement by media. It does not appear women are being excessively victimised in court, or that these cases are abusive. However, courts need to be alive to the special issues that arise. The project identified the hybrid role courts play in #MeToo cases, and a high incidence of self-representation. There is a need for protocols to ensure alleged victims are treated appropriately and fairly. Further empirical work is recommended and the quantification of unreported #MeToo cases as well. A similar analysis of reported privacy cases will follow.
€
Ursula Cheer, Impact of gender in defamation claims in the United Kingdom and New Zealand, Journal of Media Law. Published online: 18 June 2025.
Leave a Reply