ABSTRACT
By the terms of its own statute and the limits of its constitutional authority, multidistrict litigation (‘MDL’) is designed to transfer and coordinate individual lawsuits then return plaintiffs back to their chosen fora for case-specific discovery and trial. Because each plaintiff is present and has her own lawyer, there is no need for the judge to police conflicts of interest or attorney loyalty as in the MDL’s kin, the class action.
But these assumptions do not match the empirical reality. Remand is rare. MDL judges resolve 93% of the cases before them. And to some attorneys, the people of MDL are just numbers on a spreadsheet, not clients with their own agency. In conducting this first-ever study of MDL plaintiffs, we explore their experience. By moving their cases far from home, courts and attorneys seem to say ‘trust us’. But knowledge is essential to trust, and study participants knew little about the status of their case, their judge, or even the identity of their attorney …
Burch, Elizabeth Chamblee, MDL for the People (April 12, 2023), Iowa Law Review, volume 108, 1015, 2023; University of Georgia School of Law Legal Studies Research Paper No 2023-08.
Leave a Reply