A sometimes-overlooked factor in unjust enrichment claims is that the claimant must directly confer a benefit on the defendant – not indirectly, not effectively, not practically, but directly. The Florida Supreme Court made this clear in Kopel v Kopel, 229 So 3d 812, 818 (Fla 2017), holding that ‘to prevail on an unjust enrichment claim, the plaintiff must directly confer a benefit to the defendant’ (emphasis added) … (more)
‘Navigating Unjust Enrichment Claims in Florida: Direct (and Indirect) Lessons from CFLB Partnership, LLC v Diamond Blue International, Inc, and Its Predecessors’, Miguel Chamorro, JD Supra, 14 September 2022
Leave a Reply