“There is much emphasis in the European legal discourse about the importance of harmonization and whether it is attainable, sustainable, and/or desirable. The irony in all of this – at least from my rather uninformed, American perspective – is that in continuously proposing new instruments and ‘better methods’ to harmonize European law (see e.g. DCFR, CESL, etc.), the average consumer is left with more choices, but not necessarily with tangible benefits …” (more)
[Mark Kawakami, Maastricht European Private Law Blog, 8 May]]
First posted 2012-05-08 18:07:23
Leave a Reply