‘Legal Reasoning Across Commercial Disputes: Comparing Judicial and Arbitral Analyses’

“Research into legal reasoning has long been the exclusive purview of legal theorists, despite the central role that legal reasoning plays in real life. However, the recent surge of interest in legal empirical scholarship suggests that legal reasoning may be a prime field for study. There are multiple ways to approach an empirical analysis of legal reasoning, but one intriguing technique involves the comparison of arbitral and judicial reasoning …” (more)

[SI Strong, Oxford Business Law Blog, 5 October]

First posted 2020-10-08 06:32:56

Leave a Reply