Joel Nitikman, ‘Equitable Rescission of Contracts for Mistake in Canada After Great Peace: Whither Solle v Butcher?’

ABSTRACT
In 1949, Lord Denning of the Court of Appeal of England in Solle v Butcher held that equity could rescind a contract in respect of which all parties had made the same mistake, provided that the mistake was ‘fundamental’ and the party seeking rescission was not at ‘fault’. Since then, the decision has been under attack. In 2002, the same court in Great Peace purported to overrule Solle v Butcher, but in 2020 the UK Supreme Court, in one sentence in an otherwise unconnected decision, suggested that equitable contractual rescission may not be dead yet. This article explores Solle v Butcher in the context of Canadian law in general and a tax context in particular. It concludes that equitable contractual rescission is alive and well and living in Canadian tax law.

Nitikman, Joel, Equitable Rescission of Contracts for Mistake in Canada After Great Peace: Whither Solle v Butcher? (February 2022). Canadian Tax Journal/Revue fiscale canadienne, volume 69, no 4, 2021, pp 1027-1097.

First posted 2022-02-11 09:00:28

1 Comment to "Joel Nitikman, ‘Equitable Rescission of Contracts for Mistake in Canada After Great Peace: Whither Solle v Butcher?’"

  1. Kelly's Gravatar Kelly
    14 April 2026 - 20:40 | Permalink

    Has anyone used mistake for a rescission of a mortgage?

Leave a Reply to Kelly Cancel reply