“Lawyers tend to get excited when the courts create a new tort, and for good reason. The judiciary is reluctant to instigate such reform to the common law absent compelling facts, and a strong societal need for them to do so. In Seneca College v Bhadauria, the Court of Appeal found that a cause of action existed for the tort of discrimination, on the basis that the Ontario Human Rights Code …” (more)
[Omar Ha-Redeye, Slaw, 7 February]
First posted 2021-02-08 06:48:56
Leave a Reply