Contracts play a critical role in clarifying the ownership and transfer of IP, but frequently define the IP with reference to broad and non-specific terms. A recent Australian Patent Office decision in ThermoChem Recovery International Inc v FULC JV LLC [2026] APO 14 highlights how inadequate evidence of the specifics of the contract provisions and the contributors to the inventive concept can jeopardise patent entitlement claims … (more)
[Claire Gregg, The IPKat, 25 August 2026]
Leave a Reply