ABSTRACT
Argues that legislation criminalising coercive control and financial abuse should prompt a rethink of approaches to undue influence. Criticises Etridge (No 2) and its application in practice. Draws inspiration from banks’ role in combatting financial crime to suggest more promising collaborative approaches than the current box ticking of justice.
€ (Westlaw)
Claire-Michelle Smyth and Rupert Dunbar, ‘Box ticking justice: Etridge (No 2) and the illusion of protection’ [2025] Conveyancer and Property Lawyer (3) 255-269.
Leave a Reply