ABSTRACT
The doctrine of renvoi is rightly described as ‘a subject loved by academics, hated by students and ignored (when noticed) by practising lawyers (including judges)’. This article argues that the students have much the better of the argument. English commercial law has rightly rejected renvoi as a general rule, because it multiplies the expense and complexity of proceedings, while doing little to deter forum-shopping and enable enforcement. It should go even further to reject renvoi in questions of immovable property, because the special justification that this enables enforcement of English judgments against foreign land ignores the fact that title or possession of such land is generally not justiciable in English courts and such judgments will not be enforced irrespective of whether renvoi is applied.
€
Harry Stratton, Against renvoi in commercial law (2022) 17(3) Journal of Private International Law 524-537, https://doi.org/10.1080/17441048.2021.2003528. Published online: 20 January.
First posted 2022-01-31 08:00:01
Leave a Reply