Symposium on the Bivens case – Notre Dame Law Review

Lessons for Bivens and Qualified Immunity Debates from Nineteenth-Century Damages Litigation Against Federal Officers (Andrew Kent)

Recovering the Tort Remedy for Federal Official Wrongdoing (Gregory Sisk)

Going Rogue: The Supreme Court’s Newfound Hostility to Policy-Based Bivens Claims (Joanna C Schwartz, Alexander Reinert, and James E Pfander)

The Inconsistent Originalism of Judge-Made Remedies Against Federal Officers (Stephen I Vladeck)

Was Bivens Necessary? (Ann Woolhandler and Michael G Collins)

Bivens and the Ancien Régime (Carlos M Vázquez)

A Scapegoat Theory of Bivens (Katherine M Crocker)

Stare Decisis as Authority and Aspiration (Randy J Kozel)

—————!!!!!!!!!!—————

Notre Dame Law Review volume 96 issue 5 (2021)

First posted 2021-05-21 10:15:31

Leave a Reply