ABSTRACT
This article explores the nature, scope, rationale and merits of the standardisation of compensatory damages in tort law, ie the fact of giving the claimant not the value (subject to ordinary limiting principles) of his own loss, but that of the loss which an ordinary claimant placed in the same circumstances would have suffered. Standardisation happens in respect of pecuniary and non‐pecuniary losses, direct and consequential losses, and also normative losses. Its two main spurs are either that the orthodox award would not give the desired result – typically ‘too little’ damages – or that it runs into evidentiary difficulties, which the award of a typical sum overrides. While epistemic standardisation (which is not strictly standardisation) might be acceptable, the avowed granting of compensatory damages which do not aim to correspond to the claimant’s own loss should be resisted, and is in any event impossible because consequential losses can never be meaningfully standardised.
€
Eric Descheemaeker, The Standardisation of Tort Damages, Modern Law Review, https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2230.12564. First published: 17 July 2020.
First posted 2020-07-18 10:28:25
Leave a Reply