Abstract:
This article gives a concise introduction to the ‘tragedy of the anticommons.’ The anticommons thesis is simple: when too many people own pieces of one thing, nobody can use it. Usually, private ownership creates wealth. But too much ownership has the opposite effect – it leads to wasteful underuse. This is a free market paradox that shows up all across the global economy. If too many owners control a single resource, cooperation breaks down, wealth disappears, and everybody loses. Conceptually, underuse in an anticommons mirrors the familiar problem of overuse in a ‘tragedy of the commons.’ The field of anticommons studies is now well-established. Over a thousand scholars have detailed examples from across the innovation frontier, including drug patenting, telecom licensing, climate change, compulsory land purchase, oil field unitisation, music and art copyright, and post-socialist economic transition. Fixing anticommons tragedy is a key challenge for any legal system committed to innovation and economic growth.
€
Michael Heller, ‘The Tragedy of the Anticommons: A Concise Introduction and Lexicon‘. The Modern Law Review, Volume 76, Issue 1, pages 6–25, January 2013. Article first published online: 2 JAN 2013. DOI: 10.1111/1468-2230.12000.
First posted 2013-01-02 23:12:24
Leave a Reply