Aditi Bagchi, ‘Contract as Procedural Justice’

The premise of contract law is that the redistribution of entitlements that results from contract is justified by the process of agreement. But theories of contract differ importantly on how and when voluntary exchange justifies a resorting of entitlements. Pure theories regard the principles of contract as essentially derivative from some aspect of the principle of autonomy; contracting parties’ intent to assume legal obligation is in principle necessary and sufficient for its enforcement. Perfect theories do not view contract as self-justifying but regard the process of agreement as reliable evidence that contracts are welfare-improving. This article demonstrates the limitations of pure and perfect views. It favours instead imperfect theories of contract, which would have judges self-consciously pursue the normative ends of contract law as they apply context-sensitive rules.

Aditi Bagchi, Contract as Procedural Justice. Jurisprudence: An International Journal of Legal and Political Thought. DOI: 10.1080/20403313.2015.1079430. Published online: 23 Oct 2015.

First posted 2015-10-27 07:02:15

Leave a Reply